|
|
health
It can be
argued that to have good health is far more important than being rich,
being a sport or film superstar, having a happily married life or having
an interesting, exciting and well paid job. Health determines what you
can achieve in life, where you can go, your state of mind in most cases
and, your ability to make your own decisions. Good health, then, is vital
if people are to make the most of their lives.
The health
of people in North America and Europe improved immeasurably around 100
years ago with piped water coming on tap, improved sanitation and better
nutritional levels. Complementing these advances was the increase in the
number of doctors/ nurses being trained, more advanced operations being
performed and new discoveries in medicines, all of which helped push life
expectancies ever higher. The gradual introduction of health insurance
and/or free national health services ensured that health care was available
to everyone from the cradle to the grave 24/7. And today in the North,
it seems, scientists continue to conquer new frontiers in medicine allowing
surgeons to perform more intricate operations and doctors to prescribe
new and better drugs for patients. Nurses, who are mostly caring, then
look after patients until they are ready to go home or move into a residential
care centre.
In stark contrast, in countries in the South, with little money available
and few trained doctors and nurses, most governments struggle to provide
even basic healthcare. Poor as these countries are, increased pressure
falls on their health services due to the effects of people drinking dirty
water. It is estimated that half the world's hospital beds are occupied
by patients with water-borne diseases such as dysentery, diarrhoea, cholera
and typhoid. Danger to health also lurks in the developing world through
poor sanitation and in the open sewers running down the streets in shanty
towns right next to where children often play.
It is in
the South then where the fiercest battles against disease are waged daily.
But here, the fight for better health is often undermined when doctors
and nurses, once trained, opt to leave their homeland to seek better opportunities
with higher pay overseas. This aggravates an already dreadful health situation
found in most third world countries where sometimes only 1 in 3 people
have access to hospitals and medical centres. And even for these 'lucky
ones', drugs, if there are any, are too expensive. As a result, modern
advances in medicines and treatments are beyond their reach leaving the
door open for diseases of epidemic proportions like HIV/AIDS and malaria
to run rampant. This often means the decimation of entire populations
leaving children orphaned, industries depleted of skilled workers and
average life expectancy spiralling downwards.
Just one story exemplifies the frailty of life in the third world.
In a small town in Zambia, a mother brought her two children to the doctor
- one was three years old, the other thirteen. Both were very sick. The
doctor prescribed medicine for each of them. She thanked him and left.
When he saw her again, some time later, he asked her how the children
were and she told him that the younger one had died. She explained that,
as she did not have enough money to pay for treatment for both children,
with much pain, she decided to pay for the older childs medicine.
He got better quickly but the family had to watch, heartbroken, as the
younger child died.
In the North a similar situation would provoke utter outrage leading to
a government enquiry.... but in the South it is just an everyday occurrence.
One look at the comparable figures on health from countries in the North
and South underlines this yawning gap in the provision of healthcare.
| .
|
USA
|
UK
|
Japan
|
Bangladesh
|
Haiti
|
Niger
|
| Average
no patients per doctor |
329
|
560
|
464
|
4049
|
4000
|
27599
|
| No
of patients to 1 hospital bed |
314
|
266
|
79
|
2886
|
1234
|
6689
|
*Infant
mortality-per
1000 live births |
6.4
|
4.5
|
2.6
|
41
|
71
|
76
|
|
*no
children who die before their 1st birthday
|
| =Child
mortality- per 1000 |
8
|
6
|
4
|
52
|
118
|
160
|
|
=no
of children who die before their 5th birthday
|
| Life
expectancy |
78
|
80
|
83
|
67
|
61
|
52
|
| Access
clean water % |
100
|
100
|
100
|
80
|
71
|
48
|
| %
av dly intake calories FAO rec min req |
143
|
135
|
118
|
95
|
92
|
91
|
Amount
spent on health
US$ per cap
|
4873
|
2460
|
2558
|
11
|
31
|
7
|
| Total
health exp/GNI% |
14.9
|
7.6
|
8.0
|
3.5
|
5.0
|
3.7
|
And it is
with such poor health infrastructure that countries in the South also
have to confront the world's major killer diseases like Malaria, TB and
HIV AIDS.
MALARIA is a life threatening parasitic disease transmitted by mosquitos
which is endemic in more than 100 countries and infects around 225m people
every year. However, the number of deaths worldwide is falling although
new figures from the Institute of Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME)
in Seattle suggest that there are more deaths than previously thought
resulting from malaria. Research by IHME, re-analysing data going back
over 30 years, indicates that there were 1.2m deaths from malaria in 2010,
almost twice the amount estimated in the 2011 World Malaria Report. In
2004 it is now estimated that 1.8m people died as a result of malaria.
90% of the malaria cases occur in sub-Saharan Africa mostly among young
children resulting in malaria being responsible for 1 in 3 hospital admissions
in Africa. A child in Africa has, on average, between 1.5 and 5.5 episodes
of malarial fever every year. In Africa malaria kills a child every 45
seconds and is the leading cause of under-5 mortality there. After years
of research, the first ever malaria vaccine has just been developed by
GlaxoSmithKline. When the final OK is given by WHO the company will roll
out the vaccine selling it at just a fraction over cost price with the
promise to invest any profits into further tropical disease research.
There
are also drugs on the market which help reduce the risk although some
think these are believed to be losing their potency. Bednets treated with
insecticide can cut infection rates by up to half and since 2009, more
than 300 million mosquito nets have been provided, enough to cover 80%
of people at risk on the continent, thanks to the Global Fund to Fight
Aids, Tuberculosis and Malaria (see below). Malaria makes people feverish
and unable to work and many of those who survive an attack can suffer
from brain damage. In economic terms it is estimated that malaria costs
Africa $12bn (£7.5bn) or 1.3% GNI annually in lost productivity.
This tragic disease has been responsible for more deaths throughout history
than any other but now the disease may at last start to be brought under
control.
TB (tuberculosis) is a contagious disease and like the common cold it
spreads through the air. It is a disease of poverty affecting mostly young
adults in their most productive years. The vast majority of deaths are
in the developing world where only 1 in 4 sufferers from the disease has
access to effective medical treatment. In 2010 WHO announced that the
number of people falling ill with TB had fallen for the first time in
history, from 9.4 million in 2009 to 8.8 million in 2010. At the same
time, WHO believes the number of people who died from TB peaked at 1.8
million in 2003 and in 2010 had fallen to 1.4 million. Left untreated
each TB sufferer will infect on average 10 -15 people each year. TB drugs
have been around for more than 3 decades and cost as little as $10 (£6.20)
for a 6 - 8 month course of treatment. However, even at this price, many
sufferers in the developing world cannot afford drugs and without treatment
70% of them will die.
HIV/AIDS - Since being discovered in 1981, it is estimated AIDS has infected
72m people killing 25m and in sub-Saharan Africa it has become a pandemic
comparable to the Black Death in Europe in the 14th century. The United
Nations Aids Agency has recently revised down the number of people suffering
from AIDS around the world from a previously estimated 39.5m to 34m whilst
the number of new infections is also down to an estimated 2.7m in 2010
from 3.2m in 1997. Of this latest total of 34m, 22.5m of them live in
sub-Saharan Africa where an estimated 1.5m people died from the disease
in 2010 out of a world wide total of 1.8m. There AIDS now results in more
deaths than any other infectious disease and is depriving some of the
poorest countries of their most economically productive workforce. For
example in countries like Botswana, Zambia and Zimbabwe large numbers
of teachers have AIDS and they are dying faster than they can be replaced.
South Africa has the largest number of people (5.6m) living with AIDS
whilst Swaziland has the highest rate of HIV infection in the world with
26.1% of the population infected. However, thanks to organisations like
the Global Fund, half of all those needing treatment are now receiving
it.
Almost
everywhere you look in sub-Saharan Africa then AIDS is wreaking a terrible
toll resulting in 1 in 10 children being orphaned and left to be looked
after by grandparents - if they are still alive. Otherwise the eldest
child has to become the breadwinner sacrificing his/her own future to
bring up brothers and sisters many of whom will themselves have AIDS.
And as orphans these children will undoubtedly have a high risk of malnutrition,
suffer from the stress of seeing their parents die and probably never
see a school classroom.
Most countries
in sub-Saharan Africa have been slow to address the problem of AIDS mainly
because of the lack of finance, government commitment and a fragmented
health service. But a notable exception to this rule has been Uganda whose
government was quick to move into action and as a result the infection
rate there has now fallen from 30% in 1990 to just 6%.
When it
came to tackling prevention the Ugandan government used a combination
a massive advertising through the media trying to alert youngsters of
the dangers of unprotected sex and by the use of posters. The ABC approach
- Abstain, Be faithful and use a Condom - was the favoured method. At
the same time health services in poor countries are also starting to screen
blood before transfusion so that patients do not become infected in that
way.
In
2002, the UN launched the Global Fund to Fight AIDS, TB and Malaria calculating
that to make an impact it would need to raise $7bn - $10 bn annually.
In 2010/11 it is likely to receive US$11.7bn. Supported by OECD countries
and international charities including the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation,
the Global Fund has become one of the most powerful tools in the fight
against AIDS, TB and malaria. To date the Fund has financed more than
700 programmes in 150 countries saving an estimated 6.5 million lives
by providing AIDS treatment for 3.2 million people, anti-TB treatment
for 8.2 million people and distributing 190 million insecticide-treated
nets for the prevention of malaria. The battle against these diseases
then is slowly starting to be won but this progress could now be put in
jeopardy as it appears that Round 11 of funding has had to be cancelled
due to the unwillingness of donors to invest more money.
Governments
in developed countries should also use this opportune moment to go further
in helping poor countries in the South combat disease. At present only
10% of global health research addresses 90% of global disease problems
as there is little incentive for pharmaceutical companies to fund development
into finding a cure for diseases found mainly in the third world as people
there would not be able to afford the drugs. Governments in rich countries,
then, should offer to fund research into not just AIDS but all tropical
diseases like malaria, dengue fever, ebola etc on the basis of richly
rewarding success - and paying nothing for failure. This should fuel massive
research and when success comes it would dramatically change the health
landscape in the developing world. Now that would not only be globalisation
at its best, it would be one of the best investments ever made on the
globe.
Finally
it would help third world nations enormously in developing their own health
services if OECD countries refused to poach doctors and nurses trained
there. In a recent 'Lancet' investigation in Africa it was found that:-
- 23,000
doctors and nurses leave Africa every year. Only 50 of the 600 doctors
trained in Zambia in the last few years are still in that country and
there
are more Ethiopian doctors in the US than there are in Ethiopia
- out of
every 4 nurses who complete their training in Malawi: 1 migrates, 1 takes
a better paid job in another sector, 1 dies of AIDS and only 1 remains
in nursing in the country.
These are
ludicrous health statistics on medical personnel from the world's most
blighted continent and represent an appalling loss of talent to those
impoverished countries.
Rich countries,
then, should not only stop encouraging doctors and nurses trained in Africa
from coming to work over here they should move to reverse the process
altogether by offering to train doctors and nurses from the developing
world on the understanding they return to their own countries. Then even
more progress can be made towards the ideal of one day decent medical
services being made available to everyone in every country in Africa.
(Amazingly,
in the face of HIV/Aids, malaria and TB and other tropical diseases, life
expectancy in sub-Saharan Africa has risen from 40.5 years in 1960 to
50 years in 2010 so people there, despite immense challenges, are living
20% longer)
|
|