![]() |
![]() |
|
debt reliefOne
of the most welcome events of the final years of the 20th century was
the creation of the campaign which challenged international creditors
to cancel the debts of the worlds poorest countries. Coincidentally, at the same time, the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and World Bank set up the US$7-$10bn Heavily Indebted Poor Country (HIPC) Initiative in 1996 in an attempt to tackle the problems some of the worlds poorest countries were experiencing in making debt repayments. In this historic change of attitude, the IMF and World Bank accepted that some debt cancellation would be required if the poorest countries were to make any meaningful attempt at tackling the extreme poverty experienced by their people. In practice, however, this scheme proved disappointing in both the amounts available and in the conditions laid down by the creditors before any relief became due. By 1997,
Jubilee 2000 was becoming more influential and better organised having
won the support of the churches, and the major charities and NGOs
working on poverty relief in the Third World. With this backing, and catching
the mood of the time, Jubilee 2000 now started to make waves and at the
G8 meeting in Birmingham in 1998, it mobilised an astonishing 70,000 supporters
to form a human chain round the building where the annual G8 meeting was
due to be held. At the same time, 1,500,000 signatures from 50 countries
were presented to Clare Short, the UK International Development Secretary.
The result - just four hours later - a promise from Tony Blair and world
leaders to cancel $50 bn of the debts of the world's poorest countries. To date, July 2010, international loans totalling more than $95bn have been written-off the books of the 30 countries which have already reached the HIPC Completion Point as at January, 2010. These countries are - Afghanistan, Benin, Bolivia, Burkina Faso, Burundi, Cameroon, Central African Rep., Congo Rep., Democratic Republic of Congo, Ethiopia, Gambia, Ghana, Guyana, Haiti, Honduras, Liberia, Madagascar, Malawi, Mali, Mauritania, Mozambique, Nicaragua, Niger, Rwanda, Sao Tome & Principe, Senegal, Sierra Leone, Tanzania, Uganda and Zambia. At the same time 6 other countries which have reached the HIPC Decision Point (Chad, Comoros, Cote d'Ivoire, Guinea, Guinea-Bissau and Togo. These nations will now see most of their international debts cancelled once Completion Point has been reached. In total it will save these 36 countries $2.5bn annually in interest payments which will now be ring fenced and be made available for investment in health education, clean water and infrastructure. In early 2005, with the birth of the Make Poverty History campaign and the report by Tony Blair's Commission for Africa, debt relief for the poorest nations was again high up on the political agenda. And at the G8 meeting held at Gleneagles in July Tony Blair persuaded his fellow leaders to agree to cancel the outstanding international debts of countries which had reached the HIPC Completion Point. The IMF and World Bank duly endorsed this decision in September, 2005 under the Multilateral Debt Relief Initiative (MDRI). So now once countries get through HIPC, MDRI means that they get cancellation of more World Bank, IMF and African Development Bank debts than was originally agreed at Completion Point. To date this has meant that countries completing HIPC have seen another $50bn wiped off their outstanding debts as a result of MDRI.
G8 finance ministers also agreed that another 4 countries classed as 'pre-decision point countries' would also see all their international debt cancelled if and when they complete the HIPC process. These countries are Eritrea, Kyrgyz Republic, Somalia and Sudan. In another move the Paris Club of international creditors have now written-off $18bn or 60% of Nigeria's outstanding bilateral international debt of $30bn after Nigeria agreed to repay $12bn. However, Nigeria still owes $5bn - mainly to the World Bank. (Nigeria is benefiting massively at present from the rise in oil prices which saw $30bn paid by international oil companies to the Nigerian Treasury in 2008) Flushed with all this success debt campaigners are now moving on insisting that at least another 23 countries need 100% cancellation in order to meet the UN Millennium Development Goals < see globalisation>. Now that rich countries have taken the pragmatic approach and forgiven most of the debts owed by many of the world's poorest countries what does the future hold for those countries whose debts have been cancelled? For them the slate is now wiped clean and the money which would previously have been set aside for debt service payments is now freed up for investment in poverty reduction. And treasuries in these countries will no longer have the burdensome task of calculating interest payments. But these nations should no longer attract new loans from the World Bank and rich countries should no longer extend credit to them. Any future investment should only be in the form of grants that can be properly monitored for the last thing we all want to see is poor countries again getting into difficulties with loan repayments.
In a further move to help all developing countries ease the burden of debt service payments, the IMF has started to float the idea of international insolvency for countries. (Although municipalities and companies can file for insolvency, it has not been possible for countries to do so before.) This would mean that all creditors, apart from the IMF and World Bank, of course, would be forced to accept reduced or no interest payments on their loans or even a reduction in principal. This may be a welcome advance but it will be difficult to administer and will inevitably lead to developing countries paying higher interest rates on future borrowings to compensate creditors for increased risk. ================================================== * Jubilee 2000 was set up as a time limited campaign (1994-2000) seeking to convince rich countries and international institutions of the need to help the world's poorest countries by cancelling their unpayable debts as a celebration of the millennium. In these 7 years the Jubilee 2000 petition gathered 19.6m signatures from 165 countries making it the largest international petition. And taking the amount of debt relief promised by the G8 at December, 2000 - $110bn (£74bn) - this meant that each signature was worth $5,610 (£3,740). None of us regularly sign cheques for £3,740 yet each signature, often from people who had literally nothing else to give, was worth this large sum. And in what could possibly be claimed to be another record, the total income of Jubilee 2000 from 1994-2000 was probably no more than £5,000,000. If we take again the total debt relief promised by the G8 and the international institutions - $110 bn (£74bn) - it means that every £1 donated returned an incredible £14,800. What an investment! Furthermore those supporters of Jubilee 2000 who went to Birmingham in May 1998 and took part in forming the human chain round the Conference Centre can each proudly claim to be responsible for 60 children now being in primary school in Uganda, the first country to receive debt relief. And so now, within the space of just 7 years, this small group of people who set up Jubilee 2000, which later became Jubilee Debt Campaign, have now seen their dream realised and as a result many people in poor countries are no longer being born into debt. Surely a magnificent example of how a small group of dedicated people can change the world. for more information and latest campaign news see http://www.jubileedebtcampaign.org.uk |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
just1world@just1world.org |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||